United States v. Anthony D. Barber, United States of America v. David L. Hodge, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that encouraged factors normally may not be relied upon if already taken into account by the applicable guideline
• noting that the Supreme Court “made clear that it intended to adopt a traditional abuse of discretion standard”
• noting that the Supreme Court \made clear that it intended to adopt a traditional abuse of discretion standard\
• noting that encouraged factors normally may not be relied upon if already taken into account by the applicable guideline
• noting that the Supreme Court \made clear that it intended to adopt a traditional abuse of discretion standard\
• noting that “a departure premised upon [a forbidden] factor is never permissible”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).