United States v. Anthony Capanelli

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he weight given to any single [§ 3553(a)] factor is a matter firmly committed to the discretion of the sentencing judge and is beyond our review.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “While a district court must consider each § 3553(a) factor in imposing a sentence, the weight given to any single factor is a matter firmly committed to the discretion of the sentencing judge and is beyond our review.”
• “While a district court must consider each § 3553(a) factor in imposing a sentence, the weight given to any single factor is a matter firmly committed to the discretion of the sentencing judge and is beyond our review.”
• “While a district court must consider each § 3553(a) factor in imposing a sentence, the weight given to any single factor is a matter firmly committed to the discretion of the sentencing judge and is beyond our review.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “While a district court must consider each § 3553(a) factor in imposing a sentence, the weight given to any single factor is a matter firmly committed to the discretion of the sentencing judge and is beyond our review.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “While a district court must consider each § 3553(a) factor in imposing a sentence, the weight 3 given to any single factor is a matter firmly committed to the discretion of the sentencing judge and is beyond our review.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).