United States v. Anthony C. Rhodes, A/K/A Adedayo Odumowo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court plainly erred in admitting prior bad acts evidence because the “weakness of the government’s other evidence” enhanced the other acts’ prejudicial effect
• holding that the district court plainly erred in admitting prior bad acts evidence because the “weakness of the government’s other evidence” enhanced the other acts’ prejudicial effect
• holding that the district court plainly erred in admitting prior bad acts evidence because the “weakness of the government’s other evidence” enhanced the other acts’ prejudicial effect
• prosecutor's closing argument reference to improperly admitted evidence contributed to conclusion that error was not harmless

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).