Ninth Circuit· 6/6/1990
United States v. Anthony Bruce Johnson
Citations
- 903 F.2d 1219
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that a defendant must testify to preserve constitutional error
- “The district court’s finding of historical facts is reviewed under the clearly erroneous standard, but the ultimate determination of whether those facts amount to an unlawful seizure is a matter of law that we review de novo.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hug, Canby, Ezra
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. SimsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 261×
- United States v. OlanoNinth Circuit· 1995-08-09· cited 173×
- Joe Morgan v. Bill Woessner, and Clay Searle Los Angeles City, (Two Cases)Ninth Circuit· 1993-06-10· cited 155×
- United States v. James Robert HernandezNinth Circuit· 1994-09-21· cited 102×
- United States v. Marcus HooperSecond Circuit· 1991-06-05· cited 88×
- United States v. Terance PriggeNinth Circuit· 2016-07-29· cited 31×
- United States v. Carl Eugene Stephens, OpinionNinth Circuit· 2000-03-20· cited 28×
- United States v. Ruben GonzalesNinth Circuit· 1992-11-04· cited 23×
- Joe Morgan v. Bill Woessner, and Clay Searle Los Angeles City, (Two Cases)Ninth Circuit· 1992-09-15· cited 10×
- United States v. Marc WillyNinth Circuit· 2022-07-26· cited 7×
- State v. KanamuHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2005-04-22· cited 4×
- Loritz v. TerhuneNinth Circuit· 2002-12-10· cited 3×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 1995-08-09· cited 2×
- United States v. Tarhonne Michael BoydNinth Circuit· 1993-08-31
- United States v. Leslie Scott McKenneth United States of America v. Randall DarringNinth Circuit· 1994-01-05
- United States v. MedjuckNinth Circuit· 2001-12-19
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1984-12-10· cited 2,427×
- United States v. Miguel Gabriel AyarzaNinth Circuit· 1989-05-09· cited 89×
- United States v. Dora Correa PatinoNinth Circuit· 1981-06-29· cited 68×
- United States v. Barbara Behanna and William GalemoorNinth Circuit· 1987-04-10· cited 56×
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Counterdefendant/appellant v. $25,000 U.S. Currency, and Tomasino Gino Cirimele, Claimant/appelleeNinth Circuit· 1988-08-08· cited 56×
- United States v. Hughes Anderson BagleyNinth Circuit· 1988-01-13· cited 17×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.