United States v. Anthony Bruce Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a defendant must testify to preserve constitutional error
• “The district court’s finding of historical facts is reviewed under the clearly erroneous standard, but the ultimate determination of whether those facts amount to an unlawful seizure is a matter of law that we review de novo.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).