United States v. Anthony Blyden and Allen Van Putten

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that acquitted-act evidence could not be barred on the basis of collateral estoppel and may be admitted or excluded under Federal Rules of Evidence 403 and 404(b)
• noting that admitting evidence to prove an essential element of one count, but \excluding\ it as to other counts for which it might have been inadmissible under Rules 403 and 404(b), would have no practical effect

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).