United States v. Anthony Atkins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he statute-of-limitations concerns resulting from the enactment of AEDPA required a modification of Lundy’s rule[.]”
• “[T]he statute-of-limitations concerns resulting from the enactment of AEDPA required a modification of Lundy’s rule[.]”
• “[D]istrict courts confronted with a mixed petition containing potentially meritorious, unexhausted claims, should stay the petition and hold it in abeyance pending prompt exhaustion of state remedies, rather than dismissing the petition without prejudice.”
• involving a habeas claim where the statute of limitations ran

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).