Skip to main content
· 3/24/2000

United States v. Anthony Alexander Pittman, A/K/A Anthony Alexander Pittman, Sr.

Citations

  • 209 F.3d 314
  • 46 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 655
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 4854
  • 2000 WL 305526

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that leave to amend under Rule 15(a) can be denied if the amendment in circumstances involving bad faith, undue prejudice to the opposing party, or futility of the amendment
  • denying motion to amend in part because the petitioner could have “easily included” his additional claims in his original § 2255 motion
  • denying motion to amend in part because the petitioner could have “easily included” his additional claims in his original § 2255 motion
  • “Under Rule 15(a) leave to amend shall be given freely, absent bad faith, undue prejudice to the opposing party, or futility of amendment.”
  • “Where the statute of limitations bars a cause of action, amendment may be futile and therefore can be denied.”
  • “Where the statute of limitations bars a cause of action, amendment may be futile and therefore can be denied.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilkinson, Widener, Traxler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.