United States v. Anselmo Gomez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a federal prosecutor is not “constitutionally mandated” to advise a grand jury witness of his right against self-incrimination before eliciting his testimony
• noting that contentions that United States Attorneys’ Manual creates rights entitling the defendant to relief “would be against the weight of judicial authority”
• noting that contentions that United States Attorneys’ Manual creates rights entitling the defendant to relief “would be against the weight of judicial authority”
• noting that any argument by the defendant that the U.S. Attorneys’ Manual created rights entitling him to relief “would be against the weight of judicial authority”
• noting that any argument by the defendant that the U.S. Attorneys’ Manual created rights entitling him to relief “would be against the weight of judicial authority”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).