United States v. Anilkumar R. Parikh, Vasant A. Patel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding admission of out-of-court statements by a government witness, when responding to an inquiry by defense counsel, on ground that counsel “invited” the error
• “the admission of out of court statements by a government witness, when responding to an inquiry by defense counsel, creates ‘invited error’”; “[t]he confrontation clause is not implicated where the defendant seeks to introduce hearsay declarations as part of his defense”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).