United States v. Angelo Cassano, Norman \Randy\ Williams, and Clarence Cross

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the government must show “only that a defendant had knowledge of the reporting requirements and acted to avoid them”
• holding that the government must show “only that a defendant had knowledge of the reporting requirements and acted to avoid them”
• holding that witness’s testimony that two men did not help him cash checks was not hearsay because their conduct of not helping the witness was non-assertive
• reporting re- quirements were common knowledge in defendant’s business and defendant filled in the amount of each cashed check
• “[I]t is unlikely, to the point of absurdity, that it was pure coincidence that all [of the fifty-one] checks cashed by [the defendant] were in denominations under $10,000.”
• “Finally, it is unlikely, to the point of absurdity, that it was pure coincidence that all fifty-one checks cashed by [the defendant] were in denominations under $10,000.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).