United States v. Angela Aguilar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a court “may take notice of proceedings in other courts, both within and without the federal judicial system, if those proceedings have a direct relation to matters at issue”
• noting that Supplemental Rule G(2) as derived from Supplemental Rule E(2)(a), “does not articulate an onerous standard,” but presents a “low bar”
• stating that when evaluating the issue of “excusable neglect” under Rule 60(b)(1
• stating that, in context of motion to set aside default judgment, \[a] 7\\| district court may deny relief under Rule 60(b)(1) when the moving party has failed to 8 || show that she has a ‘meritorious defense\
• refusing to “manufacture” an argument for a party 21 that was inadequately briefed and lacked any citations to authority
• describing the analogous 12 burden to set aside a default judgment as “not extraordinarily heavy”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).