United States v. Angel Puentes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that § 3663(o) “provides an exhaustive list of the ways in which a mandatory restitution order can be modified”
• concluding that § 3663(o) “provides an exhaustive list of the ways in which a mandatory restitution order can be modified”
• stating a district court may modify a defendant’s sentence “only when authorized by a statute or rule”
• stating district courts lack inherent authority to modify a term of imprisonment and may do so only to the extent that a statute or rule expressly permits
• explaining, that, in cases involving multiple defendants, a district court “may make each defendant liable for the full amount of restitution, or may apportion liability among the defendants based on their level of contribution to the victims’ losses”
• \18 U.S.C. § 3664(o)[] provides an exhaustive list of the ways in which a mandatory restitution order can be modified.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).