United States v. Andrew Vela

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a subsequent change in the law does not render an appeal waiver involuntary
• holding that an appeal waiver was not rendered invalid by a subsequent change in the law
• holding that a subsequent change in the law does not render an appeal waiver involuntary
• holding that plea agreement with similar terms waived a sentencing challenge where the Supreme Court decision was not expressly made retroactive
• holding that the “plain terms” of a plea agreement with identical language precluded petitioner from challenging sentence based on a Supreme Court decision not expressly made retroactive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).