United States v. Andrew Tea Cole

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that later voluntary statement was admissible even when earlier statements must be suppressed
• suppressing defendant’s initial response to the question, “Whose gun is this?” but denying the motion to suppress later, voluntary statements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).