United States v. Andrew Miller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a “brief reference” to prejudi- cial evidence did not amount to an abuse of discretion
• concluding that a “brief reference” to prejudi- cial evidence did not amount to an abuse of discretion
• “we give ‘special deference’ to the court’s findings under Rule 403”
• “The test for harm‐ less error is whether, in the mind of the average juror, the prosecution’s case would have been significantly less per‐ suasive had the improper evidence been excluded.” (quoting 12 No. 15‐2826 United States v. Loughry, 660 F.3d 965, 975 (7th Cir. 2011)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).