United States v. Andrew Harriott, United States of America v. Andrew Harriott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• vacating and remanding for resentencing when dis- trict court clearly erred in applying U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1
• upholding convic- tions for crimes satisfying the subsequent acts requirement of a crime of which the jury acquitted the defendant
• mere acceptance of fact of convic- tion is not acceptance of responsibility
• two-level enhancement appropriate where defendant directed activities of one other person
• defen- dant's role in offense is factual question
• defendant's role in offense is factual question

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).