United States v. Andrew Eschweiler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[Requiring resentencing when the record is clear that the sentencing judge did not rely on a contested matter does not further the purpose of Rule 32(c)(3)(D).”
• “[Requiring resentencing when the record is clear that the sentencing judge did not rely on a contested matter does not further the purpose of Rule 32(c)(3)(D).”
• without attached determination there will be no record that defendant alleges information to be inaccurate
• to be resentenced, defendant must demonstrate that court failed to make findings regarding the controverted matters

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).