Skip to main content
· 12/28/2006

United States v. Andrew A. Perez

Citations

  • 473 F.3d 1147
  • 2006 WL 3802933

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • evidence implicated “the issue of guilt” because it tended “to prove that [the defendant] had been involved in the drug transactions for which he was charged”
  • evidence implicated “the issue of guilt” because it tended “to prove that [the defendant] had been involved in the drug transactions for which he was charged”
  • nevertheless affirming on plain-error review
  • nevertheless affirming on plain-error review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tjoflat, Anderson, Barkett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.