United States v. Andres Sanchez-Espinal

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \[a] charging [document] that closely tracks the language of a particular statute can establish that the defendant was charged under that section\
• “[T]he objections raised to the PSR and at the sentencing hearing did not put the district court on notice” of defendant’s argument.
• requiring exhaustion at the highest state court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).