United States v. Andres Alarcon-Simi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “it is the exclusive function of the jury to determine the credibility of witnesses, resolve evidentiary conflicts, and draw reasonable inferences from proven facts” (quoting United States v. Rojas, 554 F.2d 938, 943 (9th Cir. 1977
• finding plaintiffs purportedly exculpatory excited utterance inadmissible, as his protestation of innocence “did not relate to any incident that occurred at the time of his arrest.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).