United States v. Andrea Aiello A/K/A Antonio Aiello, Francesca Bartolotta and Lorenzo Scaduto

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a § 2255 petition must be based on more than “[a]iry generalities, conclusory assertions and hearsay statements.”
• a movant does not demonstrate entitlement to section 2255 relief or an evidentiary hearing based on “[a]iry generalities” and “conclusory assertions”
• “[S]uch inquiry may take the form of an evidentiary hearing, or the district court, in its discretion, may utilize any of the habeas rules designed to supplement the record without the necessity of conducting a full-blown evidentiary hearing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).