United States v. Andrea Aiello, A/K/A \Antonio Aiello\, Francesca Bartolotta, Lorenzo Scaduto

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that jury's impartiality was demonstrated by the nature of its verdict and careful discrimination in weighing the evidence
• stating that court must be given wide discretion to determine whether juror’s ability to perform duty impartially has been adversely affected
• noting that court erred in not placing initial discussions with tainted jurors on record but that error was harmless in light of later actions
• vacating sentences for two narcotics-conspiraey counts and one CCE count and remanding to district court to combine lesser-included conspiracy counts with CCE count
• advising counsel after voir dire of juror held harmless as long as no prejudice resulted
• advising counsel after voir dire of juror held harmless as long as no prejudice resulted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).