United States v. Anchor Warehouses, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that failure of a party to raise Pullman doctrine in district court will not necessarily operate as a waiver, while noting that a state may waive an abstention argument based on Younger
• observing that a state waives its argument for Younger Abstention by “expressly urging the district court to address the merits of the case”
• holding Bur-ford abstention inappropriate where a local landmarks commission’s decisions were reviewed by a state court of general jurisdiction, the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois
• explaining that under Burford v. Sun Oil Co., 319 U.S. 315 (1943
• affirming the denial of abstention under Burford because the decisions of the state agency were reviewed in state courts of general jurisdiction
• Bur-ford abstention was not appropriate because any court of general jurisdiction could review final administrative decisions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).