United States v. Amjad Awan, Akbar A. Bilgrami, Sibte Hassan, Syed Aftab Hussain, Ian Howard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an undercover agent was permitted to testify concerning the “meaning and import” of statements that were part of tape-recorded conversations with the defendants
• holding that a wit- ness’s testimony was based on his personal perception and admis- sible as lay testimony because he “was actually present and partici- pating in the conversation and observing what was happening at the time[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).