Skip to main content
· 10/27/1994

United States v. Amir James Attar, United States of America v. Perfect View, Inc.

Citations

  • 38 F.3d 727
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 29941
  • 1994 WL 587074

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a valid appeal waiver does not bar review of a post-plea violation of the right to counsel
  • holding that defendant’s creation “of an inextricable ethical predicament for his counsel ... can properly be viewed as a constructive discharge of counsel undertaken for dilatory or unreasonable purposes .... ”
  • holding that defendant's creation \of an inextricable ethical predicament for his counsel ... can properly be viewed as a constructive discharge of counsel undertaken for dilatory or unreasonable purposes . .\
  • concluding that appeal waiver did not encompass claim of deprivation of right to counsel
  • determining that plea agreement waiver cannot bar direct appeal based on ineffective assistance claim concerning plea proceedings
  • providing that waiver does not bar review of post-plea ineffective assistance of counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chapman, Hamilton, Phillips

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.