United States v. Amestica

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying Kasten standards, employee’s statements pointing out discrepancies on two occasions between overtime worked and paycheck, without voicing an opinion regarding the legality of the discrepancy, insufficient to put employer on notice of his intentions
• “The contract itself constitutes a claim for payment, insofar as it recites the obligations of each party to one another”
• complaint about timesheet discrepancies without \voic[ing] an opinion\ about illegality is insufficient
• discussing FERA amendments to FCA anti-retaliation provision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).