United States v. American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers, Metromedia, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “unlike the applicants in Shenandoah, Metromedia is not seeking a license whose scope or coverage differs from that contemplated by the decree but rather is asserting a claim to a reasonable fee”
• nonparty could not enforce injunction where it was “not . . . named in the judgment” even though it was “indirectly or economically benefited by the decree”
• nonparty could not enforce injunction where it was “not . . . named in the judgment” even though it was “indirectly or economically benefited by the decree”
• nonparty could not enforce injunction where it was “not . . . named in the judgment” even though it was “indirectly or economically benefited by the decree”
• nonparty could not enforce injunction where it was “not . . . named in the judgment” even though it was “indirectly or economically benefited by the decree”
• nonparty could not enforce injunction where it was “not . . . named in the judgment” even though it was “indi- rectly or economically benefted by the decree”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).