United States v. American Cyanamid Co., and Cross-Appellant, Melamine Chemicals, Inc., Intervenor-Appellant-Cross-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the district court was required to apply “the criteria used for determining a Clayton Act violation ... for determining the ‘public interest’ ”
• applying the \four corners\ rule when decree language was \quite clear\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).