Skip to main content
· 1/26/1999

United States v. Ambroid Co., Inc.

Citations

  • 34 F. Supp. 2d 86
  • 29 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 21042
  • 48 ERC (BNA) 1411
  • 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 963
  • 1999 WL 44334

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding more than one removal action in the ʺunusual circumstanceʺ where eighteen months after EPA closed site leaving behind drums of hazardous waste which had no legally‐approved method of disposal, site was broken into and drums damaged, requiring second removal action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tauro

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.