United States v. Amador Garcia, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Even if the evidence is unsubstantial that entrapment has occurred, and even if it is the defendant’s testimony alone which raises the issue, any evidence that ‘the Government’s deception actually implant(ed
• search not subject to exclusionary rule if not conducted by government agent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).