United States v. Alvin Baron

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \The fact that defense counsel may not have intended to imply that [witness's] story was fabricated is irrelevant if that inference fairly arises from the line of questioning he pursued.\
• “The jury might well have inferred that [recent fabrication] was what one defense counsel was sug- gesting from his emphasis at the beginning of his cross- examination on the fact that [the witness] had never [previ- ously] implicated defendant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).