United States v. Alverado

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Damages are an essential element of [an Arizona] misappropriation of trade 27 secret claim, and a claim fails as a matter of law without a cognizable theory of proximately caused damages.”
• “Damages [for misappropriation] are typically measured by any direct injury which a plaintiff can prove, as well as any lost profits which the plaintiff would have earned but for the infringement.”
• “The reasonable royalty theory is 14 derived from patent law, and is based not on the infringer’s profit, but on the royalty to 15 which a willing licensor and a willing licensee would have agreed at the time of the 16 misappropriation.”
• “Damages are an essential element of a misappropriation of trade secret claim [under A.R.S. § 44-401], and a claim fails as a matter of law without a cognizable theory of proximately caused 6 POWERS STEEL v. WILLIAM POWERS, et al. Decision of the Court damages.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).