United States v. Alvenis Arias-Izquierdo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a typed summary of handwritten business records created solely for litigation was inadmissible hearsay evidence
• holding a plain sentencing error affects the defendant’s substantial rights when there is a reasonable probability that, but for the error, he would have received a lesser sentence
• saying that under Federal Rule of Evidence 1006, 4 which is identical in material respects to OCGA § 24-10-1006, this requirement must be satisfied “prior to the admission of the summary”
• remanding for resentencing where defendants demonstrated reasonable probability they would have received lesser sentences but for the district court’s plain sentencing error
• \The government was not required to prove that [the defendant] participated in each element of the substantive offense in order to hold him liable as an aider and abettor\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).