United States v. Alvaro Plancarte-Alvarez, United States of America v. Alvaro Plancarte-Alvarez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that we review Rule 404(b) determi- nations for abuse of discretion
• holding that we review Rule 404(b) determinations for abuse of discretion
• admission of a prior smuggling incident “close in time and remarkably similar” supported “the government’s position that [the defendant] was engaged in purposeful and repetitive criminal behavior and was not . . . an innocent victim”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).