Skip to main content
· 11/17/2014

United States v. Allon Anderson

Citations

  • 771 F.3d 1064
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 21698
  • 2014 WL 6171796

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stressing that it is a “cardinal rule in our circuit that one panel is bound by the decision of a prior panel” (quotation marks omitted)
  • explaining we are not bound by a prior panel decision when it “is cast into doubt by an intervening Supreme Court decision”
  • “explaining we are not bound by a prior panel decision when it ⅛ cast into doubt by an intervening Supreme Court decision’ ”
  • we review de novo a defendant’s challenge to the constitutionality of a statute and the denial of a motion to dismiss the indictment
  • “[I]t is a cardinal rule in our circuit that one panel is bound by the decision of a prior panel.” (alteration in original) (citation omitted)
  • motion to dismiss indictment is reviewed de novo; noting that Howell remains correctly decided after Supreme Court’s decision in Nat’l Fed’n of Indep. Bus.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bye, Shepherd, Kelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.