United States v. Allen Walker and Wallace Crawford, Allen Walker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a defendant can, “by cross-examination of a witness[,] . . . open the door for the admission on redirect examination of matters tending to support the case, which would not have been admissible on the case in chief”
• stating that a defendant can, “by cross-examination of a witness[,] . . . open the door for the admission on redirect examination of matters tending to support the case, which would not have been admissible on the case in chief”
• “If the Government had failed to clarify the situation, the jury might well have been unfavorably impressed----”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).