United States v. Allen Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Alleyne v. United States, 570 U.S. 99 (2013
• determining that Alleyne \did not curtail a sentencing court's ability to find facts relevant in selecting a sentence within the prescribed statutory range\
• holding that the nonmoving parties were not prejudiced by the District Court's granting a motion to reopen the record on remand because they had notice of the evidence to be offered and an opportunity to rebut the evidence
• declining to reverse for plain error where our Court had not reached the issue, but three circuits had sided with the appellant
• ‘ Alleyne did not curtail a sentencing court’s ability to find facts relevant in selecting a sentence within the prescribed statutory range.” (emphasis in original)
• “Alleyne did not curtail a sentencing court’s ability to find facts relevant in selecting a sentence within the prescribed statutory range.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).