Skip to main content
· 9/5/2008

United States v. Allday

Citations

  • 542 F.3d 571
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 19128
  • 2008 WL 4095484

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no improper presumption where district court “considered [defendant’s] argument for a lower sentence and his particular circumstances” and “recognized that the Guidelines were in no way binding on its decision”
  • finding no improper presumption where district court “considered [defendant’s] argument for a lower sentence and his particular circumstances” and “recognized that the Guidelines were in no way binding on its decision”
  • affirming sentence where court explained its reasons, took into account the defendant’s health problems, and concluded that the Bureau of Prisons could adequately treat the defendant’s health issues, including his sleep apnea and diabetes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cudahy, Posner, Rovner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.