· 1/23/2002
United States v. Allan Boren
Citations
- 278 F.3d 911
- 2002 Daily Journal DAR 789
- 46 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1074
- 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 591
- 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 881
- 2002 WL 83619
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- emphasizing that in deciding a motion to dismiss, a court should not consider evidence not appearing on the face of the indictment
- “Unlike a personal check drawn by a depositor on his 3 own account, bank checks and cashier’s checks carry the promise of the bank itself.”
- “‘Of course, none of these charges have been established by evidence, but at this stage of the proceedings the indictment must be tested by its sufficiency to charge an offense.’ ” (quoting United States v. Sampson, 371 U.S. 75, 78-79 (1962))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pregerson, Reinhardt, Silverman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.