United States v. Alfredo Flores, in the Matter of Robert L. Thorp, Witness-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• A lawyer represented a client in administrative proceedings that were not intended to be confidential. Communications made in that proceeding were not privileged when the client later faced criminal charges.
• The Ninth 10 Circuit “defer[s] considerably to the judgment of the district court in fashioning the appropriate 11 sentence because of its proximity to the events out of which contempt springs.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).