Skip to main content
· 8/17/1984

United States v. Alfred Louis Love

Citations

  • 746 F.2d 477
  • 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 19454
  • 16 Fed. R. Serv. 863

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting, on direct appeal, Love’s suggestive identification challenge to a photo lineup where “all of the photo[s] were reasonably similar in appearance to Love” (emphasis added)
  • articulating a two-step process in determining the constitutionality of pretrial identification procedures: first, whether the procedures used were impermissibly suggestive and, if so, whether the identification was nonetheless reliable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wallace, Fletcher, Canby

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.