United States v. Alfred James Prince

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to order second competency examination where there was “no evidence in [the] record of any irrational behavior by [d]efendant that was not adequately explained in the single competency report”
• district court did not abuse its discretion in re- fusing to order second competency examination where there was “no evidence in [the] record of any irrational No. 02-3252 5 behavior by Defendant that was not adequately ex- plained in the single competency report”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).