United States v. Alfred Erdos

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “venue is in the district ... where the defendant is first restrained of his liberty in connection with the offense charged.”
• holding that subsection 7(3) grants territorial jurisdiction over the American embassy in Equatorial Guinea
• holding that defendant was not in custody when plane to United States landed in Boston, hence venue did not lie in Massachusetts for overseas killing
• ruling that embassies comprise part of \special territorial jurisdiction\ of United States
• finding that limiting phrase in statute is independent of and does not modify two earlier phrases because the limiting phrase is separated from the first two by a comma and the disjunctive “or”
• finding that limiting phrase in statute is independent of and does not modify two earlier phrases because the limiting phrase is separated from the first two by a comma and the disjunctive \or\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).