United States v. Alexis Javier Angueira

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that even if estoppel is available against govern- mental entity, \`the party raising the [estoppel] defense must have reasonably relied on some \affirmative misconduct\ attribut- able to the sovereign.'\
• awarding $65,641.50 for fees work, 58.2% the size of the merits 13 lodestar
• “Pretrial orders of a magistrate under 636(b)(1)(A) are 16 reviewable under the ‘clearly erroneous and contrary to law’ standard; they are not 17 subject to de novo determination[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).