United States v. Alexander Robert Holzman, United States of America v. James Walsh

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a denial of a motion to suppress may be affirmed “on any ground finding support in the record” (citation omitted)
• upholding warrant authorizing a search for “any cash, jewelry, bonds and notes obtained through this fraud scheme”
• upholding search under plain view exception to warrant requirement even though issue not pursued
• “there is no continued expectation of privacy if it has been effectively destroyed by a valid search incident to arrest”
• where probable cause suggests continuing offense involving more than specific known incidents, search may look beyond specific instances of offense to find others
• description “any property or devices used or obtained through fraud operations” insufficient

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).