United States v. Alexander Cooper and Anthony Davis, Also Known as \Future\

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that an “empty ammunition box raise[d] an inference that the contents had been used”
• “[t]he trial judge sits in the unique position to make credibility assessments of the actions of trial attorneys.”
• “The empty ammunition box raises an inference that its contents had been used in a firearm.”
• “The empty ammunition box raises an inference that its contents had been used in a firearm.”
• \[t]his Court has previously held that weapons are ’tools of the trade’ of drug dealers\
• “[T]he simultaneous possession of weapons and drugs supports an inference that the suspect is dealing drugs.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).