United States v. Alexander Calor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting defen- dant’s claim that the court order upon which his prosecu- tion under Section 922(g)(8) was based was not issued after a hearing that is within the scope of Section 922(g)(8), and finding that the minimum requirements for a hearing set forth in Section 922(g
• “The opportunity to participate requirement is satisfied because [the defendant] could have presented reasons why the court should not enter a[] [protective] order . . . at the . . . court proceeding.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).