United States v. Alex Hodge

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that the question Jones did not answer—whether the fact that an offense involves a gun is sufficient for probable cause—is still open
• explaining that suppression of evidence is \inappropriate when an officer executes a search in objectively reasonable reliance on a warrant's authority\
• finding that the fact that the defendant’s home was in the same city as the location of his anticipated drug delivery “render[ed] his home a more likely repository of his drug-related paraphernalia”
• relying on the belief of an experienced police officer that the suspect’s home would contain evidence related to drug activities
• relying on the belief of an experienced police officer that the suspect’s home would contain evidence related to drug activities
• approving use of this standard of review when the district court does “not question the facts contained in the affidavit”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).