Skip to main content
· 5/2/1994

United States v. Alejandro Pacheco-Osuna

Citations

  • 23 F.3d 269
  • 94 Daily Journal DAR 5898
  • 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3075
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 9320
  • 1994 WL 158036

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a court may depart downward on the basis of circumstances not taken into consideration by the sentencing commission only so long as \the circumstance upon which it seeks to base its departure 'is consistent with the sentencing factors prescribed by Congress' \
  • “[W]e have previously eschewed the invitation to consider parol evidence for the purpose of adding terms to or changing the terms of an integrated plea agreement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hall, Leavy, Fernandez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.