United States v. Alejandro Montez, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “that the value to society of safely reintegrating former prisoners clearly outweighs whatever marginal benefit which might accrue from extending the exclusionary rule to supervised release revocation hearings which do not involve harassment”
• “[W]e hold that the exclusionary rule, absent a showing of harassment, does not apply to revocation of supervised release hearings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).